Please sign in to download the files. A new tab will open where you can login/register.

Login

Covalent Screening Library

Covalent chemical probes remain in high demand in drug discovery (Fig. 1). By 2020, there were at least 50 FDA-approved drugs that act as covalent inhibitors. Continuous research focused on the development of irreversible inhibitors, especially for cancer targets, is reported [1].

Classification of covalent inhibitors.

Figure 1. Classification of covalent inhibitors.

Taking into account the only-growing interest in covalent inhibitors as drugs, Life Chemicals has designed a proprietary collection of around 50,000 potential covalent binders to support covalent screening projects in drug discovery (Fig. 2).

In addition, a new Diversity Screening Set of 4,800 most-promising covalently binding molecules containing a high variety of covalent warheads was designed to be used as a convenient starting point for covalent screening projects. These structurally-diverse screening compounds were shown to be optimal in terms of reactivity and essential stability, being compliant with our in-house MedChem and PAINS structural filters.

For a specific protein drug target needed, please, feel free to contact us and our molecular design team will be happy to assist you in structure optimization of potential irreversible binders, as well as in performing virtual covalent docking.

Please, contact us at orders@lifechemicals.com for any additional information and price quotations.

The additional information on the covalent inhibitor type is included into the SD file. On request, separate focused sets of covalent binders targeting each of the indicated amino acid residues (Cysteine, Serine, Lysine, Tyrosine) can be provided.

You can cherry-pick compounds or focus on a specific class of covalent modifiers.

A Pre-plated Covalent Inhibitor Screening Set based on this Screening Library can be found in our diverse collection of Pre-plated Focused Libraries.

You can also be interested in our related products:
 

Compound Selection

These small-molecule screening compounds were selected from the Life Chemicals HTS Compound Collection by specific structural moieties (functional groups), sometimes referred to as “covalent warheads”, that are known to form covalent bonds with amino acid residues (e.g., Cys, Ser, Lys, Tyr) in binding sites of target proteins.

The following chemical classes and structural features were used for the selection of possible covalent binding irreversible inhibitors:

  • β-lactams [1]
  • Alkyl halides [10]
  • Epoxides, aziridines [11-12]
  • Michael acceptors [13]:
    • α,β-unsaturated ketones [14], -nitriles [15], -esters [16]
    • maleimide-like compounds [17]
    • activated vinyl derivatives [18]
  • Cyanoacrylamides [19]
  • Sulfonate esters [20]
  • Sulfonyl fluorides [21]
  • Thioles [22]
  • Rhodanides [23]

 

  • Thiourea and thioketones [24-25]
  • o-quinones [26]
  • p-quinones [27]
  • Ketales [28]
  • Acetales [28]
  • Disulfides [29]
  • Terminal acetylenes [30]
  • Sulfoalkenes [31]
  • Aromatic nitriles [32]
  • Phenol benzoate derivatives [33]
  • Arylators [34]

Moreover, the screening molecules that are considered as potential covalent agents against specific amino acid residues according to published data [1-8] were also included in this screening set. Therefore, it should be pointed out that some cysteine and serine covalent modifiers from Cysteine Focused Covalent Inhibitor LibrarySerine Focused Covalent Inhibitor Library, respectively, may not necessarily include the traditional warheads but were demonstrated to be covalent inhibitors when in a complex with target proteins.

Screening compound distribution by the type of the covalent warhead in the Covalent Screening Library.

 

Figure 2Screening compound distribution by the type of the covalent warhead in the Diversity Set of Covalent Screening Library (4800 compounds), available also pre-plated.

covalent_library_warheadsFigure 3. Screening compound distribution by the type of the covalent warhead in the Covalent Screening Library.

Representative compounds from the Covalent Screening Library

References:

  1. Sutanto, Fandi et al. RSC medicinal chemistry vol. 11,8 876-884. 2 Jul. 2020, doi:10.1039/d0md00154f
  2. K. Zhu, K. W. Borrelli, J. Greenwood, T. Day, R. Abel, R. Farid, E. Harder J. Chem. Inf. Model., June 2014. doi: 10.1021/ci500118s
  3. D. T. Warshaviak, G. Golan, K. W. Borrelli, K. Zhu, O. Kalid J. Chem. Inf. Model., March 2014. doi: 10.1021/ci500175r
  4. Q. Liu, Y. Sabnis, Z. Zhao, T. Zhang, S. J. Buhrlage, L. H. Jones, N. S. Gray Cell Press: Chem. Biol., Vol. 20 (2), 2013, pp. 146–159.
  5. R. Mah, J. R. Thomas, C. M. Shafer Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., Vol. 24, 2014, pp. 33–39.
  6. D. S. Johnson, E. Weerapana, B. F. Cravatt Future Med. Chem., Vol. 2 (6), 2010, pp. 949–964.
  7. E. Weerapana, G. M. Simon, B. F. Cravatt Nature Chemical Bioogyl., Vol. 4, 2008, pp. 405–407.
  8. S. G. Kathman, Z. Xu, A. V. Statsyuk J. Med Chem., Vol. 57 (11), 2014, pp. 4969–4974.
  9. Mora-Ochomogo M, Lohans CT. β-Lactam antibiotic targets and resistance mechanisms: from covalent inhibitors to substrates. RSC Med Chem. 2021;12(10):1623-1639. Published 2021 Aug 4. doi:10.1039/d1md00200g
  10. Li T, Maltais R, Poirier D, Lin SX. Combined Biophysical Chemistry Reveals a New Covalent Inhibitor with a Low-Reactivity Alkyl Halide. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9(18):5275-5280. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02225
  11. Zhang N, Yang Y, Li W, et al. Asparagine and Glutamine Residues Participate in Protein Covalent Binding by Epoxide Metabolite of 8-Epidiosbulbin E Acetate In Vitro and In Vivo. Chem Res Toxicol. 2022;35(10):1821-1830. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00130
  12. Ielo L, Patamia V, Citarella A, et al. Novel Class of Proteasome Inhibitors: In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation of Diverse Chloro(trifluoromethyl)aziridines. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12363. Published 2022 Oct 15. doi:10.3390/ijms232012363
  13. Liang ST, Chen C, Chen RX, et al. Michael acceptor molecules in natural products and their mechanism of action. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1033003. Published 2022 Nov 2. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1033003
  14. Valipour M. Recruitment of chalcone's potential in drug discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. Phytother Res. 2022;36(12):4477-4490. doi:10.1002/ptr.7651
  15. Kammer LM, Lipp B, Opatz T. Photoredox Alkenylation of Carboxylic Acids and Peptides: Synthesis of Covalent Enzyme Inhibitors. J Org Chem. 2019;84(5):2379-2392. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b02759
  16. Wang C, Li S, Zhao J, et al. Design and SAR of Withangulatin A Analogues that Act as Covalent TrxR Inhibitors through the Michael Addition Reaction Showing Potential in Cancer Treatment. J Med Chem. 2020;63(19):11195-11214. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01128
  17. Tang C, Yin D, Liu T, et al. Maleimide-Functionalized Liposomes: Prolonged Retention and Enhanced Efficacy of Doxorubicin in Breast Cancer with Low Systemic Toxicity. Molecules. 2022;27(14):4632. Published 2022 Jul 20. doi:10.3390/molecules27144632
  18. Yu CH, Chou CC, Lee DY, Khoo KH, Chang GD. Target identification reveals protein arginine methyltransferase 1 is a potential target of phenyl vinyl sulfone and its derivatives. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(2):BSR20171717. Published 2018 Apr 20. doi:10.1042/BSR20171717
  19. Awoonor-Williams E, Rowley CN. Modeling the Binding and Conformational Energetics of a Targeted Covalent Inhibitor to Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase. J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61(10):5234-5242. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00897
  20. Zhou Z, Wang Q, Zhang CC, Gao J. Molecular imaging of biothiols and in vitro diagnostics based on an organic chromophore bearing a terbium hybrid probe. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(17):7435-7442. doi:10.1039/c6dt00156d
  21. Cheng Y, Li G, Smedley CJ, et al. Diversity oriented clicking delivers β-substituted alkenyl sulfonyl fluorides as covalent human neutrophil elastase inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(37):e2208540119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2208540119
  22. Doerge DR, Twaddle NC, Churchwell MI, Beland FA. Reduction by, ligand exchange among, and covalent binding to glutathione and cellular thiols link metabolism and disposition of dietary arsenic species with toxicity. Environ Int. 2020;144:106086. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106086
  23. Saeed A, Ejaz SA, Khalid A, et al. Acetophenone-Based 3,4-Dihydropyrimidine-2(1H)-Thione as Potential Inhibitor of Tyrosinase and Ribonucleotide Reductase: Facile Synthesis, Crystal Structure, In-Vitro and In-Silico Investigations. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13164. Published 2022 Oct 29. doi:10.3390/ijms232113164
  24. Song WQ, Liu ML, Li SY, Xiao ZP. Recent Efforts in the Discovery of Urease Inhibitor Identifications. Curr Top Med Chem. 2022;22(2):95-107. doi:10.2174/1568026621666211129095441
  25. Kollár L, Gobec M, Szilágyi B, et al. Discovery of selective fragment-sized immunoproteasome inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;219:113455. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113455
  26. Poojary MM, Hellwig M, Henle T, Lund MN. Covalent bonding between polyphenols and proteins: Synthesis of caffeic acid-cysteine and chlorogenic acid-cysteine adducts and their quantification in dairy beverages. Food Chem. 2023;403:134406. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134406
  27. Ballesteros-Casallas A, Quiroga C, Ortiz C, et al. Mode of action of p-quinone derivatives with trypanocidal activity studied by experimental and in silico models. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;246:114926. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114926
  28. Innocenti R, Lenci E, Menchi G, Pupi A, Trabocchi A. Design and synthesis of bicyclic acetals as Beta Secretase (BACE1) inhibitors [published correction appears in Bioorg Med Chem. 2017 Dec 15;25(24):6724-6725]. Bioorg Med Chem. 2017;25(19):5077-5083. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.03.030
  29. Schwalbe T, Huebner H, Gmeiner P. Development of covalent antagonists for β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2019;27(13):2959-2971. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2019.05.034
  30. Zhang DW, Zhang YM, Li J, Zhao TQ, Gu Q, Lin F. Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles via various terminal acetylenes and azide and their quorum sensing inhibition. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017;36:343-353. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.011
  31. Sriwilaijaroen N, Vavricka CJ, Kiyota H, Suzuki Y. Influenza A Virus Neuraminidase Inhibitors. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2556:321-353. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2635-1_21
  32. Tolmachova KA, Moroz YS, Konovets A, et al. (Chlorosulfonyl)benzenesulfonyl Fluorides-Versatile Building Blocks for Combinatorial Chemistry: Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of a Covalent Inhibitor Library. ACS Comb Sci. 2018;20(11):672-680. doi:10.1021/acscombsci.8b00130
  33. Carta F, Vullo D, Maresca A, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT. Mono-/dihydroxybenzoic acid esters and phenol pyridinium derivatives as inhibitors of the mammalian carbonic anhydrase isoforms I, II, VII, IX, XII and XIV. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21(6):1564-1569. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.05.019
  34. Hasspieler BM, Behar JV, Di Giulio RT. Glutathione-dependent defense in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and brown bullhead (Ameriurus nebulosus). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1994;28(1):82-90. doi:10.1006/eesa.1994.1036

 

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. By using our website, you accept our conditions of use of cookies to track data and create content (including advertising) based on your interest. Accept